Some centuries before the Christian era, a Jew merchant, reported to have
made one of the largest fortunes of his time (held also in repute for much
practical sagacity), left among his ledgers some general maxims which have
been preserved even to our own days. They were held in respect by the
Venetians who placed a statue of the old Jew on the angle of one of their
principal buildings. Of late years these writings have fallen into disrepute,
being opposed to the spirit of modern commerce.
He says for instance in one place: 'The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is
a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death'; adding in another, with the
same meaning: 'Treasures of wickedness profit nothing; but truth delivers from
death.' Both these passages are notable for their assertions of death as the only
real issue and sum of attainment by any unjust scheme of wealth. If we read
instead of 'lying tongue', 'lying label, title, pretence or advertisement', we shall
more clearly perceive the bearing of these words on modern business.
Again the wise man says: 'He that oppresseth the poor to increase his riches
shall surely come to want.' And again more strongly: 'Rob not the poor because
he is poor; neither oppress the afflicted in the place of business. For God shall
spoil the soul of those that spoiled them.'
This 'robbing the poor because he is poor' is especially the mercantile form of
theft, consisting in taking advantage of a man's necessities in order to obtain
his labour or property at a reduced price. The ordinary highwayman robs the
rich, but the trader robs the poor.
But the two most remarkable passages are the following:
'The rich and the poor have met.
God is their maker.'
'The rich and the poor have met.
God is their light.' Ruskin UNTO THIS LAST
www.mkgandhi.org Page 25
They 'have met.' That is to say, as long as the world lasts the action and
counteraction of wealth and poverty is just as appointed a law of the world as
the flow of stream to sea: 'God is their maker.' But also this action may be
either gentle and just, or convulsive and destructive; it may be by rage of
devouring flood or by lapse of serviceable wave. And which of these it shall be,
depends on both rich and poor knowing that God is their light.
The flowing of streams is in one respect a perfect image of the action of
wealth. Where the land falls, the water flows. So wealth must go where it is
required. But the disposition and administration of rivers can be altered by
human forethought. Whether the stream shall be a curse or a blessing depends
upon man's labour and administrating intelligence. For centuries districts of
the world, rich in soil and favoured in climate, have lain desert under the rage
of their own rivers; not only desert, but plague-struck. The stream which,
rightly directed, would have flowed in soft irrigation from field to field—would
have purified the air, given food to man and beast, and carried their burdens
for them on its bosom—now overwhelms the plain and poisons the wind; its
breath pestilence, and its work famine. In like manner human laws can guide
the flow of wealth. This the leading trench and limiting mound can do so
thoroughly that it shall become water of life—the riches of the hand of
wisdom; or on the contrary, by leaving it to its own lawless flow, they may
make it the last and deadliest of national plagues: water of Marah—the water
which feeds the roots of all evil.
The necessity of these laws of distribution or restraint is curiously overlooked
in the ordinary economist's definition of his own 'science'. He calls it the
'science of getting rich'. But there are many sciences as well as many arts of
getting rich. Poisoning people of large estates was one employed largely in the
middle ages; adulteration of food of people of small estates is one employed
largely now. All these come under the general head of sciences or arts of
getting rich. Ruskin UNTO THIS LAST
www.mkgandhi.org Page 26
So the economist in calling his science the science of getting rich must attach
some ideas of limitation to its character. Let us assume that he means his
science to be the science of 'getting rich by legal or just means'. In this
definition is the word 'just' or 'legal' finally to stand ? For it is possible that
proceedings may be legal which are by no means just. If therefore we leave at
last only the word 'just' in that place of our definition, it follows that in order
to grow rich scientifically, we must grow rich justly; and therefore know what
is just. It is the privilege of the fishes, as it is of rats, and wolves, to live by
the laws of demand and supply; but it is the distinction of humanity to live by
those of right.
We have to examine then what are the laws of justice respecting payment of
labour.
Money payment, as stated in my last paper, consists radically in a promise to
some person working for us, that for the time and labour he spends in our
service today we will give or procure equivalent time and labour in his service
at any future time when he may demand it.
If we promise to give him less labour than he has given us, we under-pay him.
If we promise to give him more labour than he has given us, we over-pay him.
In practice, when two men are ready to do the work and only one man wants
to have it done, the two men underbid each other for it; and the one who gets
it to do is under-paid. But when two men want the work done and there is only
one man ready to do it, the two men who want it done overbid each other,
and the workman is over-paid. The central principle of right or just payment
lies between these two points of injustice.
Inasmuch as labour rightly directed is fruitful just as seed is, the fruit (or
'interest' as it is called) of the labour first given, or 'advanced', ought to be
taken into account and balanced by an additional quantity of labour in the
subsequent repayment. Therefore the typical form of bargain will be: If you
give me an hour today, I will give you an hour and five minutes on demand. If
you give me a pound of bread today, I will give you seventeen ounces on
demand and so on. Ruskin UNTO THIS LAST
www.mkgandhi.org Page 27
Now if two men are ready to do the work and if I employ one who offers to
work at half price he will be half-starved while the other man will be left out
of employment. Even if I pay due wages to the workman chosen by me, the
other man will be unemployed. But then my workman will not have to starve,
and I shall have made a just use of my money. If I pay due wages to my man, I
shall not be able to amass unnecessary riches, to waste money on luxuries and
to add to the mass of poverty in the world. The workman who receives due
wages from me will act justly to his subordinates. Thus the stream of justice
will not dry up, but gather strength as it flows onward. And the nation with
such a sense of justice will be happy and prosperous.
We thus find that the economists are wrong in thinking that competition is
good for a nation. Competition only enables the purchaser to obtain his labour
unjustly cheap, with the result that the rich grow richer and the poor poorer.
In the long run it can only lead the nation to ruin. A workman should receive a
just wage according to his ability. Even then there will be competition of a
sort, but the people will be happy and skilful, because they will not have to
underbid one another, but to acquire new skills in order to secure
employment. This is the secret of the attractiveness of government services in
which salaries are fixed according to the gradation of posts. The candidate for
it does not offer to work with a lower salary but only claims that he is abler
than his competitors. The same is the case in the army and in the navy, where
there is little corruption. But in trade and manufacture there is oppressive
competition, which results in fraud, chicanery and theft. Rotten goods are
manufactured. The manufacturer, the labourer, the consumer,—each is
mindful of his own interest. This poisons all human intercourse. Labourers
starve and. go on strike. Manufacturers become rogues and consumers too
neglect the ethical aspect of their own conduct. One injustice leads to many
others, and in the end the employer, the operative and the customer are all
unhappy and go to rack and ruin. The very wealth of the people acts among
them as a curse. Ruskin UNTO THIS LAST
www.mkgandhi.org Page 28
Nothing in history has been so disgraceful to human intellect as the acceptance
among us of the common doctrines of economics as a science. I know no
previous instance in history of a nation's establishing a systematic disobedience
to the first principles of its professed religion.
The writings which we (verbally) esteem as divine not only denounce the love
of money as the source of all evil, and as an idolatry abhorred of the deity, but
declare mammon service to be the accurate and irreconcilable opposite of
God's service; and whenever they speak of riches absolute and poverty
absolute, declare woe to the rich and blessing to the poor.
True economics is the economics of justice. People will be happy in so far as
they learn to do justice and be righteous. All else is not only vain but leads
straight to destruction. To teach the people to get rich by hook or by crook is
to do them an immense disservice. Ruskin UNTO THIS LAST
ምንም አስተያየቶች የሉም:
አስተያየት ይለጥፉ